Home Home | email this page email this page | printable view of page printable view of page

« Read other entries… »

previous

<< Rest Peacefully, Mr. Ruelas. (Or, #NBCFail, Part II)

The Answer Sheet - The elephant that Obama and Lauer ignored: Poverty and student achievement |

next
Bob Braun: Idea of failing N.J. public schools promoted by politicians, privatizers, celebrities >>


Brilliant piece from Valerie Strauss

About two-thirds of the way through President Obama’s interview Monday with NBC’s Matt Lauer on school reform, I thought the two were about to really dive into the biggest issue plaguing the country’s most troubled schools.

Already discussed were the usual subjects raised by the Obama administration when it addresses school reform: charter schools, standards, how to get terrific teachers in every classroom, the length of the school year, Race to the Top and did I mention charter schools?

Then, there it was, the moment when Lauer raised the issue of poverty and the new Census Bureau figures showing that one in seven Americans live at or below the poverty line, defined as an annual income for a family of four of $22,000. That’s one in seven — and that figure doesn’t include families of four with a $23,000 annual income.

I thought Lauer would make the obvious connection between poverty and student achievement. After all, the most consistent link in education and social science research is between family income and standardized test scores. Go to the original…

Comments

(:commentboxchrono:)


Due to “comment spam” it has become necessary to remove the commenting feature from the pages of this site. Please read, “Like,” and comment at our Facebook page: Facebook.com/NotWaitingforSuperman.

   Login Login 

Legal Information | Icons courtesy of famfamfam